The Real Ideological Root of Terrorism:
Darwinism and Materialism
Introduction
Most people think the theory of evolution was first proposed by
Charles Darwin, and rests on scientific evidence, observations and
experiments. However, the truth is that Darwin was not its originator,
and neither does the theory rest on scientific proof. The theory
consists of an adaptation to nature of the ancient dogma of materialist
philosophy. Although it is not backed up by scientific discoveries,
the theory is blindly supported in the name of materialist philosophy.
This fanaticism has resulted in all kinds of disasters. Together
with the spread of Darwinism and the materialist philosophy it supports,
the answer to the question "What is a human being?" has changed.
People who used to answer: "Human beings were created by God and
have to live according to the beautiful morality He teaches", have
now begun to think that "Man came into being by chance, and is an
animal who developed by means of the fight for survival." There
is a heavy price to pay for this great deception. Violent ideologies
such as racism, fascism and communism, and many other barbaric world
views based on conflict have all drawn strength from this deception.
This article will examine the disaster Darwinism has visited on
the world and reveal its connection with terrorism, one of the most
important global problems of our time.
The Darwinist Lie: 'Life
is conflict'
Darwin set out with one basic premise when developing his theory:
"The development of living things depends
on the fight for survival. The strong win the struggle. The weak
are condemned to defeat and oblivion."
According to Darwin, there is a ruthless struggle for survival
and an eternal conflict in nature. The strong always overcome the
weak, and this enables development to take place. The subtitle he
gave to his book The Origin of Species, "The Origin of Species by
Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races
in the Struggle for Life", encapsulates that view.
Furthermore, Darwin proposed that the 'fight
for survival' also applied between human racial groups. According
to that fantastical claim, 'favoured races' were victorious in the
struggle. Favoured races, in Darwin's view, were white Europeans.
African or Asian races had lagged behind in the struggle for survival.
Darwin went further, and suggested that these races would soon lose
the "struggle for survival" entirely, and thus disappear:
At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries,
the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate,
and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same
time the anthropomorphous apes… will no doubt be exterminated.
The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider,
for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as
we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a
baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and
the gorilla.1
The Indian anthropologist Lalita Vidyarthi explains how Darwin's
theory of evolution imposed racism on the social sciences:
His (Darwin's) theory of the survival of the fittest was warmly
welcomed by the social scientists of the day, and they believed
mankind had achieved various levels of evolution culminating in
the white man's civilization. By the second half of the nineteenth
century racism was accepted as fact by the vast majority of Western
scientists.2
Darwin's Source of Inspiration:
Malthus's Theory of Ruthlessness

Thomas Robert Malthus
|
Darwin's source of inspiration on this subject was the British
economist Thomas Malthus's book An Essay on the Principle of Population.
Left to their own devices, Malthus calculated that the human population
increased rapidly. In his view, the main influences that kept populations
under control were disasters such as war, famine and disease. In
short, according to this brutal claim, some people had to die for
others to live. Existence came to mean "permanent war."
In the 19th century, Malthus's ideas were widely accepted. European
upper class intellectuals in particular supported his cruel ideas.
In the article "The Scientific Background
of the Nazi 'Race Purification' Programme", the importance
19th century Europe attached to Malthus's views on population is
described in this way:
In the opening half of the nineteenth century, throughout Europe,
members of the ruling classes gathered to discuss the newly discovered
"Population problem" and to devise ways of implementing the Malthusian
mandate, to increase the mortality rate of the poor:
"Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage
contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower,
crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the
plague. In the country we should build our villages near stagnant
pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and
unwholesome situations," and so forth and so on.3
As a result of this cruel policy, the weak, and those who lost
the struggle for survival would be eliminated, and as a result the
rapid rise in population would be balanced out. This so-called "oppression
of the poor" policy was actually carried out in 19th century Britain.
An industrial order was set up in which children of eight and nine
were made to work sixteen hours a day in the coal mines and thousands
died from the terrible conditions. The "struggle for survival" demanded
by Malthus's theory led to millions of Britons leading lives full
of suffering.
Influenced by these ideas, Darwin applied this concept of conflict
to all of nature, and proposed that the strong and the fittest emerged
victorious from this war of existence. Moreover, he claimed that
the so-called struggle for survival was a justified and unchangeable
law of nature. On the other hand, he invited people to abandon their
religious beliefs by denying the Creation, and thus undermined at
all ethical values that might prove to be obstacles to the ruthlessness
of the "struggle for survival."
Humanity has paid a heavy price in the 20th century for the dissemination
of these callous views which lead people to acts of ruthlessness
and cruelty.
What 'The Law of the Jungle'
Led to: Fascism
As
Darwinism fed racism in the 19th century, it formed the basis of
an ideology that would develop and drown the world in blood in the
20th century: Nazism.
A strong Darwinist influence can be seen in Nazi ideologues. When
one examines this theory, which was given shape by Adolf Hitler
and Alfred Rosenberg, one comes across such concepts as "natural
selection", "selective mating", and "the struggle for survival between
the races", which are repeated dozens of time in the works of Darwin.
When calling his book Mein Kampf (My Struggle), Hitler was inspired
by the Darwinist struggle for survival and the principle that victory
went to the fittest. He particularly talks about the struggle between
the races:
History would culminate in a new millennial empire of unparalleled
splendour, based on a new racial hierarchy ordained by nature
herself.4
In the 1933 Nuremberg party rally, Hitler proclaimed that "a higher
race subjects to itself a lower race… a right which we see in nature
and which can be regarded as the sole conceivable right".
That the Nazis were influenced by Darwinism is a fact that almost
all historians who are expert in the matter accept. The historian
Hickman describes Darwinism's influence on Hitler as follows:
(Hitler) was a firm believer and preacher of evolution. Whatever
the deeper, profound, complexities of his psychosis, it is certain
that [the concept of struggle was important because]… his book,
Mein Kampf, clearly set forth a number of evolutionary ideas,
particularly those emphasizing struggle, survival of the fittest
and the extermination of the weak to produce a better society.5
Hitler, who emerged with these views, dragged the world to violence
that had never before been seen. Many ethnic and political groups,
and especially the Jews, were exposed to terrible cruelty and slaughter
in the Nazi concentration camps. World War II, which began with
the Nazi invasion, cost 55 million lives. What lay behind the greatest
tragedy in world history was Darwinism's concept of the "struggle
for survival."
The Bloody Alliance: Darwinism and Communism
While fascists are found on the right wing of Social Darwinism,
the left wing is occupied by communists. Communists have always
been among the fiercest defenders of Darwin's theory.
This relationship between Darwinism and communism goes right back
to the founders of both these "isms". Marx and Engels, the founders
of communism, read Darwin's The Origin of Species as soon as it
came out, and were amazed at its 'dialectical materialist' attitude.
The correspondence between Marx and Engels showed that they saw
Darwin's theory as "containing the basis in natural history for
communism". In his book The Dialectics of Nature, which he wrote
under the influence of Darwin, Engels was full of praise for Darwin,
and tried to make his own contribution to the theory in the chapter
"The Part Played by Labour in the Transition from Ape to Man".
Russian communists who followed in the footsteps of Marx and Engels,
such as Plekhanov, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin, all agreed with Darwin's
theory of evolution. Plekhanov, who is seen as the founder of Russian
communism, regarded marxism as "Darwinism
in its application to social science".6
Trotsky said, "Darwin's discovery is the
highest triumph of the dialectic in the whole field of organic matter."
7
'Darwinist education' had a major role in the formation of communist
cadres. For instance, historians note the fact that Stalin was religious
in his youth, but became an atheist primarily because of Darwin's
books.8
Mao, who established communist rule in China and killed millions
of people, openly stated that "Chinese socialism
is founded upon Darwin and the theory of evolution." 9
The Harvard University historian James Reeve Pusey goes into great
detail regarding Darwinism's effect on Mao and Chinese communism
in his research book China and Charles Darwin.10
In short, there is an unbreakable link between the theory of evolution
and communism. The theory claims that living things are the product
of chance, and provides a so-called scientific support for atheism.
Communism, an atheist ideology, is for that reason firmly tied to
Darwinism. Moreover, the theory of evolution proposes that development
in nature is possible thanks to conflict (in other words "the struggle
for survival") and supports the concept of "dialectics" which is
fundamental to communism.
If we think of the communist concept of "dialectical conflict",
which killed some 120 million people during the 20th century, as
a "killing machine" then we can better understand the dimensions
of the disaster that Darwinism visited on the planet.
Darwinism and Terrorism
As we have so far seen, Darwinism is at the root of various ideologies
of violence that have spelled disaster to mankind in the 20th century.
The fundamental concept behind this understanding and method is
"fighting whoever is not one of us."
We can explain this in the following way: There are different beliefs,
worldviews and philosophies in the world. It is very natural that
all these diverse ideas have traits opposing one another. However,
these different stances can look at each other in one of two ways:
1) They can respect the existence
of those who are not like them and try to establish dialogue with
them, employing a humane method. Indeed, this method conforms with
the morality of the Qur'an.
2) They can choose to fight others,
and to try to secure an advantage by damaging them, in other words,
to behave like a wild animal. This is a method employed by materialism,
that is, irreligion.
The horror we call terrorism is nothing other than a statement
of the second view.
When we consider the difference between these two approaches, we
can see that the idea of "man as a fighting
animal" which Darwinism has subconsciously imposed on people
is particularly influential. Individuals and groups who choose the
way of conflict may never have heard of Darwinism and the principles
of that ideology. But at the end of the day they agree with a view
whose philosophical basis rests on Darwinism. What leads them to
believe in the rightness of this view is such Darwinism-based slogans
as "In this world, the strong survive", "Big fish swallow little
ones", "War is a virtue", and "Man advances by waging war". Take
Darwinism away, and these are nothing but empty slogans.
Actually, when Darwinism is taken away, no philosophy of 'conflict'
remains. The three divine religions that most people in the world
believe in, Islam, Christianity and Judaism, all oppose violence.
All three religions wish to bring peace and harmony to the world,
and oppose innocent people being killed and suffering cruelty and
torture. Conflict and violence violate the morality that God has
set out for man, and are abnormal and unwanted concepts. However,
Darwinism sees and portrays conflict and violence as natural, justified
and correct concepts that have to exist.
For this reason, if some people commit terrorism using the concepts
and symbols of Islam, Christianity or Judaism in the name of those
religions, you can be sure that those people are not Muslims, Christians
or Jews. They are real Social Darwinists. They hide under a cloak
of religion, but they are not genuine believers. Even if they claim
to be serving religion, they are actually enemies of religion and
of believers. That is because they are ruthlessly committing a crime
that religion forbids, and in such a way as to blacken religion
in peoples' eyes.
For this reason, the root of the terrorism that plagues our planet
is not any of the divine religions, but in atheism, and the expression
of atheism in our times: "Darwinism" and "materialism."
ISLAM IS NOT THE SOURCE OF TERRORISM,
BUT ITS SOLUTION
Some people who say they are acting in the name of religion may
misunderstand their religion or practice it wrongly. For that reason,
it would be wrong to form ideas about that religion by taking these
people as an example. The best way to understand a religion is to
study its divine source.
The holy source of Islam is the Qur'an; and the model of morality
in the Qur'an-Islam-is completely different from the image of it
formed in the minds of some westerners. The Qur'an is based on the
concepts of morality, love, compassion, mercy, humility, sacrifice,
tolerance and peace, and a Muslim who lives by that morality in
its true sense will be most polite, considerate, tolerant, trustworthy
and accomodating. He will spread love, respect, harmony and the
joy of living all around him.
Islam is a Religion of Peace and Well-Being
The word Islam is derived from the word meaning "peace" in Arabic.
Islam is a religion revealed to mankind with the intention of presenting
a peacable life through which the infinite compassion and mercy
of God manifest on earth. God calls all people to Islamic morals
through through which mercy, compassion, tolerance and peace can
be experienced all over the world. In Surat al-Baqara verse 208,
God addresses the believers as follows:
You who believe! Enter absolutely into peace (Ýslam).
Do not follow in the footsteps of Satan. He is an outright enemy
to you.
As the verse makes clear, security can only be ensured by 'entering
into Islam', that is, living by the values of the Qur'an.
God Has Condemned Wickedness
God has commanded people to avoid committing evil; He has forbidden
disbelief, immorality, rebellion, cruelty, aggressiveness, murder
and bloodshed. He describes those who fail to obey this command
as "following in Satan's footsteps" and adopting a posture that
is openly revealed to be sinful in the Qur'an. A few of the many
verses on this matter in the Qur'an read:
But as for those who break God's contract after
it has been agreed and sever what God has commanded to be joined,
and cause corruption in the earth, the curse will be upon them.
They will have the Evil Abode. (Surat ar-Ra'd: 25)
Seek the abode of the hereafter with what God
has given you, without forgetting your portion of the world. And
do good as God has been good to you. And do not seek to cause
mischief on earth. God does not love mischief makers.' (Surat
al-Qasas: 77)
As we can see, God has forbidden every kind of mischievous acts
in the religion of Islam including terrorism and violence, and condemned
those who commit such deeds. A Muslim lends beauty to the world
and improves it.
Islam Defends Tolerance and Freedom of Speech
Ýslam is a religion which provides and guarantees freedom of ideas,
thought and life. It has issued commands to prevent and forbid tension,
disputes, slander and even negative thinking among people.
In the same way that it is determinedly opposed to terrorism and
all acts of violence, it has also forbidden even the slightest ideological
pressure to be put on them:
There is no compulsion in religion. Right guidance
has become clearly distinct from error. Anyone who rejects false
gods and believes in God has grasped the Firmest Handhold, which
will never give way. God is All-Hearing, All-Knowing. (Surat al-Baqara:
256)
So remind, you need only to remind. You cannot
compel them to believe. (Surat al-Ghashiyah: 22)
Forcing people to believe in a religion or to adopt its forms of
belief is completely contrary to the essence and spirit of Islam.
According to Ýslam, true faith is only possible with free will and
freedom of conscience. Of course, Muslims can advise and encourage
each other about the features of Qur'anic morality, but they will
never resort to compulsion, nor any kind of physical or psychological
pressure. Neither will they use any worldly privilege to turn someone
towards religion.
Let us imagine a completely opposite model of society. For example,
a world in which people are forced by law to practice religion.
Such a model of society is completely contrary to Ýslam because
faith and worship are only of any value when
they are directed to God by the free will of the individual.
If a system imposes belief and worship on people, then they will
become religious only out of fear of that system. From the religious
point of view, what really counts is that religion should be lived
for God's good pleasure in an environment where peopls' consciences
are totally free.
God Has Made the Killing of Innocent People Unlawful
According to the Qur'an, one of the greatest sins is to kill a
human being who has committed no fault.
...If someone kills another person - unless it
is in retaliation for someone else or for causing corruption in
the earth - it is as if he had murdered all mankind. And if anyone
gives life to another person, it is as if he had given life to
all mankind. Our Messengers came to them with Clear Signs but
even after that many of them committed outrages in the earth.
(Surat al-Ma'ida: 32)
Those who do not call on any other deity together
with God and do not kill anyone God has made inviolate, except
with the right to do so, and do not fornicate; anyone who does
that will receive an evil punishment. (Surat al-Furqan: 68)
As the verses suggest, a person who kills innocent people for no
reason is threatened with a great torment. God has revealed that
killing even a single person is as evil as murdering all mankind.
A person who observes God's limits can do no harm to a single human,
let alone massacre thousands of innocent people. Those who assume
that they can avoid justice and thus punishment in this world will
never succeed, for they will have to give an account of their deeds
in the presence of God. That is why believers, who know that they
will give an account of their deeds after death, are very meticulous
to observe God's limits.
God Commands Believers to be Compassionate
and Merciful
Islamic morality is described in the Qur’an as:
...To be one of those who believe and urge each
other to steadfastness and urge each other to compassion. Those
are the Companions of the Right. (Surat al-Balad: 17-18)
As we have seen in this verse, one of the most important moral
precepts that God has sent down to His servants so that they may
receive salvation and mercy and attain Paradise, is to "urge
each other to compassion".
Ýslam as described in the Qur'an is a modern, enlightened, progressive
religion. A Muslim is above all a person of peace; he is tolerant
with a democratic spirit, cultured, enlightened, honest, knowledgeable
about art and science and civilized.
A Muslim educated in the fine moral teaching of the Qur'an, approaches
everyone with the love that Ýslam expects. He shows respect for
every idea and he values art and aesthetics. He is conciliatory
in the face of every event, diminishing tension and restoring amity.
In societies composed of individuals such as this, there will be
a more developed civilization, a higher social morality, more joy,
happiness, justice, security, abundance and blessings than in the
most modern nations of the world today.
God Has Commanded Tolerance and Forgivenes
The concept of forgiveness and tolerance, described in the words,
'Make allowences for people' (Surat al-A'raf: 199), is one of the
most fundamental tenets of Islam.
When we look at the history of Ýslam, the way that Muslims have
translated this important feature of Qur'anic morality into the
life of society can be seen quite clearly. Muslims have always brought
with them an atmosphere of freedom and tolerance and destroyed unlawful
practices wherever they have gone. They have enabled people whose
religions, languages and cultures are completely different from
one another to live together in peace and harmony under one roof,
and provided peace and harmony for its own members. One of the most
important reasons for the centuries-long existence of the Ottoman
Empire, which spread over an enormous region, was the atmosphere
of tolerance and understanding that Ýslam brought with it. Muslims,
who have been known for their tolerant and loving natures for centuries,
have always been the most compassionate and just of people. Within
this multi-national structure, all ethnic groups have been free
to live according to their own religions, and their own rules.
True tolerance can only bring peace and well-being to the world
when implemented along the lines set out in the Qur'an. Attention
is drawn to this fact in a verse which reads:
A good action and a bad action are not the same.
Repel the bad with something better and, if there is enmity between
you and someone else, he will be like a bosom friend. (Surat al-Fussilat:
34)
Conclusion
All of this shows that the morality that Ýslam recommends to mankind
brings to the world the virtues of peace, harmony and justice. The
barbarism known as terrorism, that is so preoccupying the world
at present, is the work of ignorant and fanatical people, completely
estranged fromQur'anic morality, and who have absolutely nothing
to do with religion. The solution to these people and groups who
try to carry out their savagery under the mask of religion is the
teaching of true Qur'anic morality. In other words, Islam and Qur'anic
morality are solutions to the scourge of terrorism, not supporters
of it.
 
1.
Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, 2nd edition, New York, A L.
Burt Co., 1874, p. 178
2. Lalita Prasad Vidyarthi, Racism, Science and
Pseudo-Science, Unesco, France, Vendôme, 1983. p. 54
3. Theodore D. Hall, The Scientific Background of
the Nazi "Race Purification" Program, http://www.trufax.org/avoid/nazi.html
4. L.H. Gann, "Adolf Hitler, The Complete Totalitarian",
The Intercollegiate Review, Fall 1985, p. 24; cited in Henry M.
Morris, The Long war Against God, Baker Book House, 1989, p. 78
5. Hickman, R., Biocreation, Science Press, Worthington,
OH, pp. 51-52, 1983; Jerry Bergman, "Darwinism and the Nazi Race
Holocaust", Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal 13 (2): 101-111,
1999
6. Robert M. Young, Darwinian Evolution and Human
History, Historical Studies on Science and Belief, 1980
7. Alan Woods and Ted Grant, Reason in Revolt: Marxism
and Modern Science, London: 1993
8. Alex de Jonge, Stalin and The Shaping of the
Soviet Uninon, William Collins Sons & Limited Co., Glasgow, 1987,
p. 22
9. K. Mehnert, Kampf um Mao's Erbe, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt,
1977
10. James Reeve Pusey, China and Charles Darwin,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1983
|