In this segment of the documentary dealing with dogs we are informed about the various types of this animal and its special qualities such as its sense of smell. Evolution has made erroneous claim about the origins of these animals from which the following statement is quoted:
"The forebears of the Canidae family lived in the immense forests 35 million years ago and now we know that its ancestors go back to an extinct mammal. The fossil record shows how the Canidae family evolved. Its most distant ancestor was Hesperocyon or animals that hollowed out trees also known as dawn dog. It had short legs and a long body. It was different from the ancestors of cats only in its appearance. The grandchildren of the dawn dog evolved and became members of the Canidae family we know today."
This kind of story serves only to reflect the prejudice of evolutionists. It is an impossible venture to establish an ancestral-generational link between the fossil record and modern dogs. There is no series of fossils that would allow evolutionists to support their claim. Considering the invalidity of the series evolutionists produced relying on the story of the evolution of the horse, it can be more easily seen that the evolutionary development based on Hesperocyon are based on fantasy. The horse series that evolutionists for years defended as proof of evolution and used a mainstay in their propaganda turned out to be invalid and the series was finally accepted by evolutionists as invalid. Apart from the above fantasies, evolutionists have nothing to say about the origin of dogs. They have been able to produce no fossils, not even an incoherent series, as proof for the origin of dogs.
Like all other groups of animals, the Canidae family came into being without any ancestor and has come down to us without having undergone any change. In short, the claims of Animal Planet are based only on prejudice and unfounded supposition.2003-05-06 00:00:00