The Evolution Deceit

Evolutionist Propaganda On The History Channel

Enlarge video
Towards the end of January, the History Channel television company embarked on evolutionist propaganda consisting of four programs. Interestingly enough, this propaganda was not limited to the History Channel, since other channels such as National Geographic and Discovery Channel stepped up their own evolutionist propaganda at exactly that same time.

The History Channel Covers Up The Scientific Facts And Repeats The Myth Of Evolution

Towards the end of January, the History Channel television company embarked on evolutionist propaganda consisting of four programs. Interestingly enough, this propaganda was not limited to the History Channel, since other channels such as National Geographic and Discovery Channel stepped up their own evolutionist propaganda at exactly that same time.

Behind these broadcasts, initiated from three different directions, lie developments that have recently taken place in the scientific world and which prove the invalidity of the theory of evolution. These pro-evolution channels intend their propaganda campaign to cover up the damage these discoveries have done to the theory.

The series begun to be broadcast by the History Channel come under the title "Living History: The Ape-Man." However, since the History Channel first broadcast these programs there have been new developments that have further undermined the scenario of human evolution. The History Channel has deliberately ignored these developments and has not hesitated to broadcast the old stories that are no longer of any value at all in the face of the new findings. We herewith present the developments in question for the History Channel"s attention and call in it not to broadcast material that flies in the face of the scientific facts for the sake of Darwinist propaganda.

The Collapse of the Human Evolution Scenario; April 2002- January 2003

Fossils From Georgia Deal a Mortal Blow to the Human Evolution Scenario

July 4 - Skull fossils unearthed during an archaeological excavation in Dmanisi in Georgia in 1999 caused a widespread reaction in the scientific world. The age and features of these fossilized bones were of a kind to challenge the evolutionist chronologies. Based on these fossils, a number of eminent paleontologists stressed the invalidity of certain classical evolutionary scenarios at the Seckenberg Conference in Germany. (1) The latest skull fossils found at Dmanisi deepen still further the damage done to evolutionary scenarios by the first discoveries. The fossils caused great excitement in the media, and were reported by MSNBC under the headline "Fossil Discovery Upsets Theory on Human Origins." (2) Paleontologists seeking the imaginary "missing link"" were no longer able to defend their old claims in the face of the picture now emerging with the increasing number of fossils that failed to fit in with the evolutionist chronology. No concrete proof to show that there had been evolution from ape to man had been found anywhere in the fossil records.

The Fossil That Made Them Confess: Sahelanthropus tchadensis


July 7 - The fairy story of evolution that has been recounted for the last 150 years was dealt another blow by a fossil skull found in Chad and known as Sahelanthropus. Daniel Lieberman, an anthropologist from Harvard University, described the 7 million-year-old fossil as the discovery of the century and said, "This [discovery] will have the impact of a small nuclear bomb." The fossil definitively overturned the evolutionist myth of a gradation beginning with apes and ending in modern man. It was understood that the idea of the "ape-man" acquiring a gradually more modern appearance, as maintained in newspapers and magazines, was untrue. Moreover, it was also realized that the so-called missing link (between man and ape), widely used as a propaganda tool and which evolutionists claimed would inevitably be discovered one day, was actually missing because it did not exist. The paleontologist Henry Gee, the editor of the famous magazine Nature which announced the fossil discovery to the world, described it as "the most important find in living memory" and wrote the following in an article in the Guardian newspaper:

Whatever the outcome, the skull shows, once and for all, that the old idea of a "missing link" is bunk... It should now be quite plain that the very idea of the missing link, always shaky, is now completely untenable. (3)

Forced Speculation in Time Magazine


August 27 - Detailed analyses by Joseph Mastropaolo, a world famous scientist and member of the American Physiology Society, invalidated Time"s evolutionist propaganda. The Time magazine had announced to the world that the fossils of the species Ardipithecus ramidus kadabba discovered by the California University anthropologist Yohannes Haile-Selassie in Ethiopia represented the "missing link." In its July 12, 2002 dated cover story entitled "Meet your newfound ancestor, a chimplike forest creature," it discussed the fossil in question in terms of an evolutionary ancestor that walked on two feet. Evolutionists who studied the fossil had claimed the creature was 5.5-5.8 million years old and capable of bipedal walking. However, the bone they based all these claims on was just a single toe. Some 95% of the skeleton was missing, yet evolutionists were still able to come up with the totally unrealistic idea that iIt could supposedly be seen from this toe that this creature was capable of walking on two legs, which shows in turn that man and apes evolved from a common ancestor. The evolutionist magazine Time felt no need to question whether the claims rested on any scientific foundation and portrayed the evolution tales embellished with pictures of ape-men to the world as scientific fact.

Matsropaolo, regarded as one of the most respected authorities in the world of paleontology, wanted to be sure of the facts by examining the toe himself. He compared the Kaddaba toe bone to those of man, chimpanzees and baboons. Comparing the anatomic criteria from a mathematical perspective, Mastropaolo arrived at very different results. The toe did not resemble those of chimpanzees or baboons at all. The resemblance between it and the human toe was also insufficient.

Mastropaolo"s findings were unveiled at the San Diego Conference held by the American Physiology Society on August 27, 2002. It was made clear in the concluding part of the paper that the idea of an evolutionary ancestor walking upright was a work of pure imagination:

Accordingly, the objective ancestry analyses for fossil bones assert that the conclusions of Haile-Selassie and Robinson were farfetched speculations. (4)

"Chimps on Two Legs Run Through Darwin"s Theory"


September 13 - The report in the well-known newspaper in Scotland, The Scotsman, of a discovery tore down another one of the classical myths of evolution. We have all seen the ape-man diagrams in evolutionist newspapers and magazines, which begin with an ape walking on four legs and then take on increasingly human characteristics, finally arriving at modern man. According to the theory this progression is based on, human beings evolved from so-called apes that walked on four legs. However, one species of chimpanzee discovered by Liverpool University anthropologist Dr. Robin Crompton belied that tale. The researcher encountered chimpanzees in Uganda"s Bwindi jungle area that were able to walk on two legs. The Scotsman covered the story under the headline "Chimps On Two Legs Run Through Darwin"s Theory." Dr. Crompton commented, "This is contrary to the accepted idea that we evolved from chimpanzees which were knuckle-walking - or walking around on all fours." (5)

The Difference Between Ran and Chimpanzee More Than Trebled


September 23 - There was one story that evolutionists created with false information and one-sided interpretations that was used to make the headlines for decades: The idea that man and chimpanzees were related, based on genetic analyses. One piece of research revealed that the difference between man and chimpanzee was three times greater than had been believed. (6) The way this piece of research widened that difference showed the invalidity of the evolutionists" claims about genetic relationships.


As we have seen, there have been a large number of scientific developments in a period of just six months that have clearly demonstrated the invalidity of the theory of evolution with regard to the origin of man. The History Channel must no longer hesitate to confront the scientific facts it has sought to conceal. Instead of blindly engaging in Darwinist propaganda, it must explain, clearly and in full as a history channel how the scientific discoveries of the last 150 years have actually demolished Darwinism.




1. Pat Shipman, "Doubting Dmanisi", American Scientist, November-December 2000, p.491 "Fossil Discovery Upsets Theories on Human Origins," 4 July 20024.
3. Henry Gee, "Face of Yesterday", 11 July 2002,3605,752778,00.html6.  
4. "Oldest Human Ancestor is (Again) Called into Question", August 27, 2002
5 . "Chimps on Two Legs Run Through Darwin"s Theory", September 13, 2002  
6. "Human-chimp DNA difference trebled", September 23, 2002

2003-01-01 00:00:00

Harun Yahya's Influences | Presentations | Audio Books | Interactive CDs | Conferences| About this site | Make your homepage | Add to favorites | RSS Feed
All materials can be copied, printed and distributed by referring to this site.
(c) All publication rights of the personal photos of Mr. Adnan Oktar that are present in our website and in all other Harun Yahya works belong to Global Publication Ltd. Co. They cannot be used or published without prior consent even if used partially.
© 1994 Harun Yahya. -