Darwinists may imagine that Darwin made stunning discoveries following his voyages on HMS Beagle, and that he developed the idea of evolution that way.
What Darwin actually did on the Beagle is this: Darwin embarked on a naval adventure lasting several months, yelling out with drunken crew members. He collected plants and insects, but did not go to the bother of looking after them, and just set them to one side (One can find details in his autobiography). What people think of as scientific research is Darwin’s naval trip spent drinking with members of the crew. Darwin later proposed the twisted ideas of his grandfather, a freemason, as if they were a great scientific discovery and led masses of people to a pagan religion.
If Darwinists' claims were true, then the fossil record should contain a large number of very strange life forms with several eye sockets, noses in different places, a jaw in the back as well as in the front, and abnormally developed skulls, as pictured here. Yet no such fossil has ever been found after 150 years of research. On the contrary, all the fossils unearthed to date show that all living things have been flawless and fully formed since the moment they first came into being, and never changed so long as they existed.
Neither during this voyage nor after it did Darwin have any scientific discovery or evidence. He merely sought to maintain a heresy inherited from his grandfather, Erasmus Darwin. Darwin at that time imagined that the cell was a balloon full of water. He was ignorant of the science of genetics. He was not even familiar with the electron microscope. The only thing he knew was the need for transitional fossils if his claims were to be confirmed as true. But he also knew that no such thing existed. He therefore openly stated that “future generations” would find these as yet undiscovered imaginary transitional forms, OTHERWISE HIS THEORY WOULD COLLAPSE. Darwin’s exact words read:
... Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?… But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?… Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory. (Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, pp. 172, 280)
At present, too, just as Darwin admitted, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL. Darwinists are in a state of shock. Darwin’s prophecy has come true. And what is more, science has revealed that natural selection is not an evolutionary force, that the genetic structures of living things are incredibly complex, that no random process can produce such a perfect structure or add any new genetic information, and that life can never emerge from inanimate substances. These are other things Darwin did not know. After the fossil record, perhaps the greatest blow to Darwinism came when THEY WERE UNABLE TO MANUFACTURE EVEN A SINGLE PROTEIN. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE for the protein that they cannot produce in the laboratory TO FORM BY CHANCE. These facts have all led to Darwinism’s collapse.2009-06-01 14:13:12