A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE THEORY
The roots of evolutionist thought go back as far as antiquity as
a dogmatic belief attempting to deny the fact of creation. Most
of the pagan philosophers in ancient Greece defended the idea of
evolution. When we take a look at the history of philosophy we see
that the idea of evolution constitutes the backbone of many pagan
philosophies.
However, it is not this ancient pagan philosophy,
but faith in God which has played a stimulating role in the birth
and development of modern science. Most of the people who pioneered
modern science believed in the existence of God; and while studying
science, they sought to discover the universe God has created and
to perceive His laws and the details in His creation. Astronomers
such as Copernicus, Keppler, and Galileo;
the father of paleontology, Cuvier;
the pioneer of botany and zoology, Linnaeus; and Isaac Newton, who
is referred to as the "greatest scientist who ever lived", all studied
science believing not only in the existence of God but also that
the whole universe came into being as a result of His creation.
6 Albert
Einstein, considered to be the greatest genius of our age,
was another devout scientist who believed in God and stated thus;
"I cannot conceive of a genuine scientist without that profound
faith. The situation may be expressed by an image: science without
religion is lame."7
One of the founders of modern physics, German
physician Max Planck said: "Anybody
who has been seriously engaged in scientific work of any kind realizes
that over the entrance to the gates of the temple of science are
written the words: Ye must have faith. It is a quality which the
scientist cannot dispense with."8
The theory of evolution is the outcome of the materialist philosophy
that surfaced with the reawakening of ancient materialistic philosophies
and became widespread in the 19th century. As we have indicated
before, materialism seeks to explain nature through purely material
factors. Since it denies creation right from the start, it asserts
that every thing, whether animate or inanimate, has appeared without
an act of creation but rather as a result of a coincidence that
then acquired a condition of order. The human mind however is so
structured as to comprehend the existence of an organising will
wherever it sees order. Materialistic philosophy, which is contrary
to this very basic characteristic of the human mind, produced "the
theory of evolution" in the middle of the 19th century.
Darwin’s Imagination
The person who put forward the theory of evolution the way it is
defended today, was an amateur English naturalist, Charles Robert
Darwin.
Darwin had never undergone a formal education in biology. He took
only an amateur interest in the subject of nature and living things.
His interest spurred him to voluntarily join an expedition on board
a ship named H.M.S. Beagle that set out from England in 1832 and
travelled around different regions of the world for five years.
Young Darwin was greatly impressed by various living species, especially
by certain finches that he saw in the Galapagos Islands. He thought
that the variations in their beaks were caused by their adaptation
to their habitat. With this idea in mind, he supposed that the
origin of life and species lay in the concept of "adaptation
to the environment". Darwin opposed the fact that God created
different living species separately, suggesting that they rather
came from a common ancestor and became differentiated from each
other as a result of natural conditions.
Charles Darwin |
Darwin's hypothesis was not based on any scientific discovery
or experiment; in time however he turned it into a pretentious
theory with the support and encouragement he received from the
famous materialist biologists of his time. The idea was that the
individuals that adapted to the habitat in the best way transferred
their qualities to subsequent generations; these advantageous qualities
accumulated in time and transformed the individual into a species
totally different from its ancestors. (The origin of these "advantageous
qualities" was unknown at the time.) According to Darwin,
man was the most developed outcome of this imaginary mechanism.
Darwin called this process "evolution
by natural selection". He thought he had found the "origin
of species": the origin of one species was another species. He published
these views in his book titled The Origin of Species, By Means of
Natural Selection in 1859.
Darwin was well aware that his theory faced lots of problems. He
confessed these in his book in the chapter
"Difficulties of the Theory".
These difficulties primarily consisted of the fossil record, complex
organs of living things that could not possibly be explained by
coincidence (e.g. the eye), and the instincts of living beings.
Darwin hoped that these difficulties would be overcome by new discoveries;
yet this did not stop him from coming up with a number of very inadequate
explanations for some. The American physicist Lipson made the following
comment on the "difficulties" of Darwin:
On reading The Origin of Species,
I found that Darwin was much less sure himself
than he is often represented to be; the chapter entitled "Difficulties
of the Theory" for example, shows considerable self-doubt. As a
physicist, I was particularly intrigued by his comments on how the
eye would have arisen. 9
While developing his theory, Darwin was impressed
by many evolutionist biologists preceding him, and primarily by
the French biologist, Lamarck. 10
According to Lamarck, living creatures passed the traits they acquired
during their lifetime from one generation to the next and thus evolved.
For instance, giraffes evolved from antelope-like animals by extending
their necks further and further from generation to generation as
they tried to reach higher and higher branches for food. Darwin
thus employed the thesis of "passing the acquired traits" proposed
by Lamarck as the factor that made living beings evolve.
But both Darwin and Lamarck were mistaken because in their day,
life could only be studied with very primitive technology and at
a very inadequate level. Scientific fields such as genetics and
biochemistry did not exist even in name. Their theories therefore
had to depend entirely on their powers of imagination.
| Darwin's
Racism
One of the most important yet least-known aspects
of Darwin is his racism: Darwin regarded white Europeans as
more "advanced" than other human races. While Darwin presumed
that man evolved from ape-like creatures, he surmised that
some races developed more than others and that the latter
still bore simian features. In his book, The Descent of
Man, which he published after The Origin of Species, he
boldly commented on "the greater differences between men of
distinct races".1 In his book, Darwin held blacks and Australian
Aborigines to be equal to gorillas and then inferred that
these would be "done away with" by the "civilised races" in
time. He said:
At some future period, not very distant as measured
by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly
exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world.
At the same time the anthropomorphous apes... will no doubt
be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies
will then be wider, for it will intervene in a more civilised
state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape
as low as baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian
and the gorilla.2
Darwin's nonsensical ideas were not only theorised,
but also brought into a position where they provided the most
important "scientific ground" for racism. Supposing
that living beings evolved in the struggle for life, Darwinism
was even adapted to the social sciences, and turned into a
conception that came to be called "Social Darwinism.
Supposing that living beings evolved in the
struggle for life, Darwinism was even adapted to the social
sciences, and turned into a conception that came to be called
"Social Darwinism".
Social Darwinism contends that existing
human races are located at different rungs of the "evolutionary
ladder", that the European races were the most "advanced"
of all, and that many other races still bear "simian" features.
1 Benjamin Farrington, What Darwin Really
Said. London: Sphere Books, 1971, pp. 54-56
2 Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, 2nd ed., New York: A.L.
Burt Co., 1874, p. 178 |
While the echoes of Darwin's book reverberated, an Austrian botanist
by the name of Gregor Mendel
discovered the laws of inheritance in 1865. Not much heard
of until the end of the century, Mendel's discovery gained great
importance in the early 1900s. This was the birth of the science
of genetics. Somewhat later, the structure of the genes and the
chromosomes was discovered. The discovery, in the 1950s, of the
structure of the DNA molecule that incorporates genetic
information threw the theory of evolution into a great crisis. The
reason was the incredible complexity of life and the invalidity
of the evolutionary mechanisms proposed by Darwin.
These developments ought to have resulted in Darwin's theory being
banished to the dustbin of history. However, it was not, because
certain circles insisted on revising, renewing, and elevating the
theory to a scientific platform. These efforts gain meaning only
if we realise that behind the theory lay ideological intentions
rather than scientific concerns.
  
6
Dan Graves, Science of Faith: Forty-Eight Biographies of Historic
Scientists and Their Christian Faith, Grand Rapids, MI, Kregel Resources.
7 Science, Philosophy, And Religion: A Symposium,
1941, CH.13.
8 Max Planck, Where is Science Going?, www.websophia.com/aphorisms/science.php..
9 H. S. Lipson, "A Physicist's View of Darwin's
Theory", Evolution Trends in Plants, Vol 2, No. 1, 1988, p.
6..
10 Although Darwin came up
with the claim that his theory was totally independent from that
of Lamarck's, he gradually started to rely on Lamarck's assertions.
Especially the 6th and the last edition of The Origin of Species
is full of examples of Lamarck's "inheritance of acquired traits".
See Benjamin Farrington, What Darwin Really Said, New York: Schocken
Books, 1966, p. 64..
|